Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BItfields Larger than 32 Bits

From: Kevin Cox <kevincox@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:08:28 -0400

On 13/05/14 15:06, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
> The better will be add 64bits bitfields... ;-)
> 

Unless I am missing something a 64 bit bitfield can't be used because
the bitmask field of header_field_info is only 32 bits wide.

Cheers,
Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BItfields Larger than 32 Bits
  - From: Michal Labedzki

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] BItfields Larger than 32 Bits
  - From: Kevin Cox
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] BItfields Larger than 32 Bits
  - From: Alexis La Goutte

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Expert info and other menus missing in Qt development release (1.11.3)?
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Expert info and other menus missing in Qt development release (1.11.3)?
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BItfields Larger than 32 Bits
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] BItfields Larger than 32 Bits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread