[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Apr 14, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> If a reviewer thinks the current patch is "a good start" for a feature
>> (and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay to give the +2?
> 
> I don't see why not, but he or she should probably check with the
> submitter first.

So +1 might be better - that way, the submitter can +2 the code if they deem it ready for prime time.