Sorry, this was my mistake. I got it into my head that I'd landed the
smb-direct dissector for some reason, when I clearly hadn't.
That kind of day, I guess.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Wireshark code review
<code-review-do-not-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> URL: https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=75015e4351e666cdbd89e4c459aed91bc462c2cc
> Submitter: Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> Changed: branch: master
> Repository: wireshark
>
> Commits:
>
> 75015e4 by Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
>
> Can't register in a non-existent dissector table.
>
> This will have to wait until the SMB Direct dissector is actually
> committed. There's no point in getting a bunch of "OOPS: dissector
> table "smb_direct" doesn't exist" messages every time you run Wireshark
> or TShark.
>
> Change-Id: I9772eb3f119822fbeaa78876570798d49bb4cab9
> Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/382
> Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Actions performed:
>
> from 1084b88 Fix indentation.
> adds 75015e4 Can't register in a non-existent dissector table.
>
>
> Summary of changes:
> epan/dissectors/packet-smb.c | 1 -
> epan/dissectors/packet-smb2.c | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
> mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe