Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Backporting r54812

From: Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:05:04 -0500
r50646/ga39e5b9 should definitely be backported - that it isn't on the
list was an oversight on my part.

r50647/g3e8b8f0 is just a comment update - feel free to ignore or
backport depending on which is easier.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The last item in the old roadmap task list is backporting
> r54812/gdae8660 to master-1.10. However, it appears to depend on
> r50646/ga39e5b9 and r50647/g3e8b8f0. Should they be backported as well?
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe