[Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good! :)

Gilbert

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 02/17/14 17:44, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 05:07:04PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:

After yet another patch submission where this was unclear, I would
like to propose the following change:

tvb_length, tvb_length_remaining, etc. are changed to all operate on
the reported length on the wire

tvb_reported_* are dropped in favor of tvb_captured_* which operate on
the available captured length (what is currently given by just
tvb_length).

The problem is that 95% of the time the intended behaviour is best
achieved by the reported length,

What's the use case of remaining 5%? Heuristic dissectors?

Yes (so we can check if it's our packet without throwing an exception).  And "can I do reassembly/checksum/whatever?"  (aka "do I have the whole packet?")

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe