Guy Harris skrev 2013-09-18 23:28:
On Sep 14, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jeff Morriss skrev 2013-09-13 23:12:
tools/make-tap-reg.py
Anders Broman
I don't remember writing this
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?revision=27489&view=revision
The log message was
Replace the clists with gtk_list_store
Should fix bug https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3246
which doesn't seem to have anything to do with the script - did you write it to speed up builds (especially on Windows - getting rid of repeated CreateProcess() calls on Windows, as they're costlier than {v}fork()+exec on UN*X:
Yes
r2873 | gram | 2001-01-10 23:21:35 -0800 (Wed, 10 Jan 2001) | 8 lines
Add a python script which has the same functionality as the shell
script 'make-reg-dotc'. It is used only in the Win32 build because the
make-reg-dotc shell script is *so* sloooooooooow on Win32, due to the
multiple processes (grep, grep, sed) launched multiple times for each
source file. By putting all the text-mangling logic into a single Python
script, only one process is launched, and the source files are read
only once. It's *a lot* faster... seconds instead of minutes.
was the reason the Python make-register script was written) and check it in accidentally as part of that commit?
Yes probably
if I did it's a copy of the make-register script, I have no problem with having
GPL2 copyright notice added.
If Gilbert's OK with GPLv2ing make-dissector-reg.py, then we might as well GPLv2 make-tap-reg.py as well.
Yes
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe