[Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml@xxxxxxxxx>]

using wmem_epan_scope() it seems to work. Is it correct to use that scope?

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm trying to address se_alloc() calls. If I change this:

Index: packet-infiniband_sdp.c

===================================================================

--- packet-infiniband_sdp.c (revision 52002)

+++ packet-infiniband_sdp.c (working copy)

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@

 #include <epan/packet.h>

 #include <epan/prefs.h>

 #include <epan/conversation.h>

+#include <epan/wmem/wmem.h>

 #include <stdlib.h>

 #include <errno.h>

 

@@ -529,8 +530,8 @@

         heur_dissector_add("infiniband.mad.cm.private", dissect_ib_sdp, proto_ib_sdp);

 

         /* allocate enough space in the addresses to store the largest address (a GID) */

-        manual_addr_data[0] = se_alloc(GID_SIZE);

-        manual_addr_data[1] = se_alloc(GID_SIZE);

+        manual_addr_data[0] = wmem_alloc(wmem_file_scope(), GID_SIZE);

+        manual_addr_data[1] = wmem_alloc(wmem_file_scope(), GID_SIZE);

 

         initialized = TRUE;

     }

@@ -567,4 +568,3 @@

 

     }

 }

-

tshark -v crashes. What is wrong with my patch?