[Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Martin Kaiser <lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I just found that

if (...)
   SET_ADDRESS(...);
else
   SET_ADDRESS(...);

does not compile as this would expand to

if (...)
{
};
else
{
}

and the compiler complains about else without if.

Is there anything useful we could do about this other that putting
another pair of brackets around the first SET_ADDRESS?

The usual trick in this situation is to wrap the macro in a "do { MY CODE } while (0)" so that it behaves syntactically like a normal function call. I have done this in r51819, so it should work now.

Cheers,
Evan