[DbdM Tbt <spin.x2k@xxxxxxxxx>]

Good day Gilbert,

Thank you for your reply.
I would just like to add additional information (forgot to include them last night):
1. used the latest stable release (1.10.1)
2. same behavior observed in windows xp 32bit (vs2010) and centos 6.4 32bit/64bit.
3. dissector dissects successfully.
4. protocol seems to be registered as it can be seen in 'Analyze'->'Enabled Protocols'
5. filter name shows in the drop down selection in the display filter combo box

I also just ran 'tshark -G protocols' and the protocol is indeed known.
Perhaps it is as you say that the protocol is matching something else.
Haven't yet tried dftest and will try it as time permits.

Thank you,
David

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The protocol filter name checks for the existence of the protocol entry in the proto_tree data structure hierarchy.

This is done with proto_tree_add_item(), as in this example from packet-ip.c :

ti = proto_tree_add_item(tree, proto_ip, tvb, offset, hlen, ENC_NA)

Could it be that your "proto_ABC" was not added to the tree in this way?

Or, maybe the value that was assigned to your protocol via proto_register_protocol() changed during execution?

As a test, compile "dftest" and run dftest with your protocol name, and see what the "display filter virtual machine" opcodes will be. Maybe your protocol name is matching something else?

Also,  you can run: "tshark -G protocols" to see if your protocol really is known.

Gilbert

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:55 AM, DbdM Tbt <spin.x2k@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Good day to all,

I have been trying to figure out a behavior for a while now where the 'filter name' (third parameter of proto_register_protocol() function) does not filter the captured messages.
For a brief background, I am studying/using an existing openflow dissector:
https://github.com/CPqD/ofdissector

I have scanned the README.developer and from looking at the ofdissector code, everything seems to be in order.

At first I thought that the 'filter name' should be the same as the first 'prefix' of the display filters registered in hf_register_info declarations. Meaning if the display filters are like 'abc.yyy.xxx', the filter name should be 'abc'.
But I think this does not necessarily need to be the case as I tried changing the prefixes in another of my dissectors and the filter name seems to work fine.

Does anyone have any possible leads/reasons/hypothesis as to where should I be looking to fix this?

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,
David

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe