Hi,
This patch fixes it...
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman
Sent: den 6 augusti 2013 16:05
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow.
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Huus
Sent: den 6 augusti 2013 16:01
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will revert the change to use a hash table for transport name
>> resolution as soon as I can, the performance is horrible.
>
>It shouldn't be, glib hash tables are pretty efficient. If you profile, where is the time being spent?
Can't profile it just now...
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Attachment:
addr.patch
Description: addr.patch