On Jul 13, 2013, at 12:45 PM, "Turney, Cal" <cal.turney@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, "Turney, Cal" <cal.turney@xxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> It is on Ethernet jumbo-capable Intel, Broadcom, and some others. It looks like the original tcpdump developer hard-coded 1516 when he probably meant 1514.
So jumbo frames appear to be larger than the snapshot length?
> Are you saying that rather than adding an option to ignore snapshot_length/packet size discrepancies it might be best to not generate these warnings?
Yes. I.e., it might be best to just hardwire in the "ignore those discrepancies" option.