On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Dirk Jagdmann <doj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I just tried to use cmake to build current Wireshark SVN trunk source code. It fails early on with errors like:
>>
>> [ 5%] Building C object tools/lemon/CMakeFiles/lemon.dir/lemon.c.o
>> /Users/djagdmann/ws-trunk/trunk/tools/lemon/lemon.c:443:8: error: cast from 'char *' to 'struct action *' increases required
>> alignment from 1 to 8 [-Werror,-Wcast-align]
>> ap = (struct action *)msort((char *)ap,(char **)&ap->next,
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> /Users/djagdmann/ws-trunk/trunk/tools/lemon/lemon.c:457:24: error: cast from 'char *' to 'struct state *' increases required
>> alignment from 1 to 8 [-Werror,-Wcast-align]
>> newaction->x.stp = (struct state *)arg;
>>
>> and many more of this type. Is somebody looking into cmake builds on OsX?
>
> This isn't a cmake issue, it's a clang issue. Clang is a bit less forgiving when it comes to playing games with alignment. Cmake's only contribution to the problem is that it defaults to clang (probably because it defaults to cc rather than gcc).
Lemon isn't our code, and is only used as an intermediate in the build
process. It should probably be in the non-fatal (dirty) group in
automake and cmake.
> SPARC is even less forgiving, as in "your program crashes if it tries to do an unaligned load or store", so, unless we want to abandon support for SPARC-based machines, we should seriously consider fixing those complaints *AND*, if there's a gcc option to warn about those errors, turning that on to make it more likely that the build will fail if somebody submits code that "gee, it worked on my PC, what's the problem?"
GCC has -Wcast-align which is already enabled on my current
configuration, but it doesn't produce this warning (at least with my
current GCC, which is relatively old).
> (There may be other processors that either trap on unaligned accesses, as SPARC processors do, or do other non-unaligned-fetch/store things, such as ignoring the low-order bits of the address. I think Alpha and MIPS did that. Yes, PowerPC/Power Architecture processors, these days, do unaligned fetches/stores, as far as I know, and recent ARM processors might, but....)
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe