On 04/29/13 16:27, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 4/29/13 1:09 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Apr 29, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Unfortunately a lot of changes in fuzz-test.sh haven't been backported
to 1.6 so output on that branch might be missing helpful information.
Any reason *not* to backport them?
Not really. I copied over fuzz-test.sh from 1.8 in r49086.
Why not the trunk version? Actually I had been thinking of taking the
trunk version back to (at least) 1.8 because that version shows us
useful stuff like the source code version, etc.
(I admit I haven't looked at how substantial the changes are.)