Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Packet Loss due to Disk Contention with Running Dumpcap in a

From: John Powell <jrp999@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 07:13:20 -0600
Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the heads up - I have obtained a 300 G SSD that I will experiment with.

I will let you know if I find the same result.

Richard suggested using XFS and putting the metadata onto the SSD.  I have never worked with XFS before so if you are anyone else has any experience with splitting metadata from an XFS file system to a different drive from the data, guidance would be excellent!!

Thanks again for helping me work this issue through!

-John

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Powell wrote:
I am looking at using a SSD for my OS and my Capture volume which may help out with the Disk IO issue but eliminating the copy from the /TMP would definitely be an asset.

I found it interesting that at one of the Sharkfest presentations a few years ago one of the CACE tech (now Riverbed) guys said NOT to use SSDs for high-speed capturing.  IIRC they had tried them and found them slower than old-fashioned high-speed disks for continuous writing.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe