On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:01:01PM -0400, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> So should r45182 and r45189 be scheduled for backport to fix bug 6208?
I think r45189 is buggy, if wireshark is refiltering, and you get new packets,
some packets might have wrong relative timestamps (displayed, captured),
and wrong value in cumulative bytes column.
I haven't reproduce it, it's just from reading wireshark code.
I'm going to fix it, but I want to do it with some code cleanup.
If we want to have bug #6208 fixed in 1.x we need to revert r45189 + do:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6208#c9
I'm not sure if I have time for writting such patch, but If anyone write one,
I can review.
PS: anyway, you need to backport all revisions, reverted one also,
cause these reverts were not only reverts, but revert with some code addition :|
Regards,
Jakub.