mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I was running checkfiltername.pl and discovered that the idl2wrs
generated dissectors don't follow the convention of using the filter
name registered with the protocol as the start of any display filter
name. Was this just an oversight, or was it intentional?
I believe the attached patch will fix the problem, but I don't know the
first thing about the idl2wrs generation or how to regenerate the
necessary dissector files, so I thought I'd send it out for comment.
I don't know much about the IDL stuff but I recently made a bunch of
changes to it (and rebuilt the dissectors). My cheat-sheet for how to
re-generate them came from this check-in comment:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=39932
:-)
(Of course you also need the omniorb stuff, etc. first.)
If you don't want to muck with it I could try to apply this patch and
regenerate but it'll probably be a few days before I'll have a chance.