[Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just dissector. The GUI plugins are really tied to the GUI front-ends. I suppose all plugins need a well-defined API... but my main interest is the back-end stuff.

Gilbert

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Also on my wish list is a rigorously-defined plugin API, with its own
>> versioning, so that 3rd party plugin writers can know which versions of
>> wireshark their plugins will work with.
>
>
> This has been on my wish-list for a while now [1], so I'm very much looking
> forward to what you come up with. Unfortunately my main development machine
> is also Linux, so I can't help with cross-platform very much.

Are you referring here to dissector plugins only, or GUI plugins as well?

--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe