[Pontus Fuchs <pontus.fuchs@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2012-06-21 17:16, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Hmm, I should have investigated a little further before sending the 
> email.
> ws80211_toolbar_new() is testing for a ENOTSUP return from 
> ws80211_init() which never returns ENOTSUP.  Does one of the error 
> returns from that function mean "Wireless support not enabled"?  Maybe 
> the test (which results in that message instead of just "Failed to 
> initialize ws80211") should go away?
Actually looking as the source I now see that my suggestion was incorrect.

ENOTSUP is what the linux kernel returns if the kernel lacks wireless 
support. I assumed it was ws80211_utils.c that returned ENOTSUP in the 
#else-code that was compiled when libnl is missing.
I'll try to fix this asap.

Cheers,

Pontus