On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:35:40AM +0000, etxrab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=41953
>
> User: etxrab
> Date: 2012/04/05 03:35 AM
>
> Log:
> Use common code to have the same hf field for DSCP in IPv4 and IPv6.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
> Changes Path Action
> +12 -2 packet-ip.c Modified
> +1 -0 packet-ip.h Modified
> +2 -7 packet-ipv6.c Modified
See my mail on ip_version: I'm going to revert this if there are no
good points to leave it this way. Btw, if someone feels this patch is
"valid", then why was the ipv6 filter removed. As ipv6 is the future
(as everyone knows :) the ip(v4) should be removed instead. Now how
many users would be going to accept the solution that way around?
Ciao
Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.