[Tobias Weiss <tweiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for your quick replies (Jeff
& Lars).

I guess I have to explain my real problem
in more detail. I want to implement a dissector for a quite old protocol
that has 2 stages. The packets of the first stage have a fixed length (4
byte) and the packets of the second stage can have an arbitrary length
but with a fixed header (8 bytes).

Unfortunately the content of a 4 byte
frame can be the beginning of the 8 byte header. So I have to figure out
where stage 1 ends and stage 2 starts. But as the payload of one TCP frame
can contain the last stage 1 frame(s) and the first stage 2 frame, this
is not straightforward. So my idea was to do this just once with the first
packet and save the state in the conversation data and subsequently reuse
that information. Because detecting the end of stage 1 is pretty easy if
you know where you are in the stream.

And now I'm not sure if something like
this could happen within the same conversation:

TCP connect -> stage 1 frames ->
stage 2 frames -> TCP disconnect -> TCP connect -> stage 1 frames
-> stage 2 frames

In this case I cannot just save the
packet number where stage 1 ends if my dissector gets the same conversation
for multiple connects/disconnects.

Tobi

"RUOFF, LARS (LARS)" <lars.ruoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

05/11/2012 11:33 AM

Please respond to
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation tracking

Hi Tobi, 
I don't understand your concern. (but that may be due to my weird understanding
of English)
If those packets are part of the same stream, i.e. they are being identified
as belonging to the same conversation (by whatever means, eg adress-port
mapping etc.), then the whole point of conversation tracking is that you
will get the *same* conversation object for all those packets.
So you can store things in there and retrieve them when dissecting another
packet of that same conversation.

Regards,
Lars



________________________________

From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tobias Weiss
Sent: vendredi 11 mai 2012 16:30
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation tracking



Right now I'm puzzled: I wanted to use conversation tracking in order to
save information about the state of the communication across packet dissection.

The dissector is called completely out of order (which is reasonable) but
I get always the same conversation, even when dissecting an older packet
than the last one. So saving the state of the communication is completely
pointless if the same conversation is used for dissecting random packets.
Here is an example just in case you don't understand my possibly weird
English ;-) 

I have a stream of 10 packets and something interesting was send in packet
number 3. Now I want to save this information in the conversations data
in order to reuse it when dissecting future packets. But the dissector
is called randomly (which is ok) but always with the same conversation
(which is absolutely not ok in this case). 

I simply cannot rely on the saved information. So how am I supposed to
use conversation tracking in a sane way (as far as I can see I can't _track_
anything)??? 

Tobi 




Tobias Weiss <tweiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

05/10/2012 06:03 PM 
Please respond to
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
                
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
                
Subject
                
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation tracking

                





Section 2.2.3 (The example conversation code using se_alloc'd memory) from
the trunk. 

Tobi 




Stephen Fisher <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

05/10/2012 05:59 PM 

Please respond to
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To
                
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
                
Subject
                
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conversation tracking


                






---- On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:54:44 -0600 Tobias Weiss  wrote ---- 

>
>Thanks, this is working just fine. 
> 
>But in that case I suggest an update to README.developer as I copied
the buggy source-code from there. 

Which section(s) were you copying the source code from?

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
           mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe