Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
From: ankit <ankitha@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:26:20 +0530
Hi Thank you fro your suggestion. I have solved the problem. The problem was in the FIELDDISPLAY part of the definition of &hf_event_link_detect. It is defined as 1 but is to be put as 32 ie the size of &hf_event_list. Thanks & Regards Ankith On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 19:29 +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote: > Hi Ankitha, > > What the value of event_fields ? > Do you have look other dissector use proto_tree_add_bitmask ? > (packet-gsm_sim.c or packet-ieee80211.c ) > > Regards, > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:50 PM, <ankitha@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > I am currently working on developing of MIH protocol plugin. > I am > using proto_tree_add_bitmask and getting the error in the > packets as - > 17:55:33 Warn Dissector bug, protocol MIH, in packet > 8: > proto.c:7166: failed assertion "len * 8 == hf->display" > > What may be the error? > The following is the definition of the datatype where the > error occurs- > > { > &hf_event_link_detect, > { > "MIH LINK Detected", > "mih.event_list.link_detect", > FT_BOOLEAN, > 1, > NULL, > LINK_DETECT_MASK, > NULL, HFILL > } > } > > and the call to the function is like this- > > evt_list_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(tlv_tree, > ett_event_bitmap); > proto_tree_add_bitmask(evt_list_tree, tvb, offset, > hf_event_list, > ett_event_bitmap, event_fields, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN); > > -->hf_event_list is defined this way- > { > &hf_event_list, > { > "List of Events", > "mih.event_list", > FT_UINT32, > BASE_HEX, > NULL, > 0x0, > NULL, HFILL > } > }, > > Let me know if any extra info is required. > > NB:I am sorry for duplicating the mail, but the problem is a > little > urgent. > > Regards > Ankith > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list > <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: ankitha
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- From: Alexis La Goutte
- [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Mu Dynamics, Inc. Security Advisories MU-201202-01 and MU-201202-02 for GnuTLS and Libtasn1
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 41728: /trunk/ /trunk/: configure.in
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] (no subject)
- Index(es):