[Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Sur ! it is not a problem ! :-)

Regards

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tyson Key <tyson.key@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Krishnamurthy,

Whilst I'm not a core developer, I don't see why that would be a
problem. (In fact, that's how I submitted some of my own dissectors).

Tyson.

On 1 March 2012 03:01, Krishnamurthy Mayya <krishnamurthymayya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is it ok if we create a new bug in wireshark bugzilla to say that we are
> working on writing the decoding module for these protocols and attach the
> patches, packets after we are done with it??
> I just wanted to avoid the duplicate work getting done by many. I am
> currently working on writing the decoding modules based on few RFCs and will
> actually take some time to submit it back.
>
> Thanks in advance for the reply.
>
> Thanks and regards
> Krishnamurthy Mayya
>

> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe



--
                                          Fight Internet Censorship!
http://www.eff.org
http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon |
00447934365844
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe