Yes, I was informed that that’s how they were spelled in the spec, so that’s why I reverted the changes. - Chris From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Mathieson
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 10:00 AM
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40275: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-rlc.c On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, <cmaynard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
aspell and my own spelling preferences do not always agree with the spelling variations used by folks across the pond. Revert a couple of spelling changes.
Probably they should be whatever is in the spec (3GPP TS 25.322).
Martin
-- |
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email. Thank you.