[Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release
over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down.
Is there any reason to delay 1.7.0 at this point?

On 11/2/11 12:51 AM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote:
> So today somebody at my company wanted to check the latest Wireshark. Looking at http://www.wireshark.org/download.html he read the description literally which said that the 1.6.0rc2 is the latest development release. So he figured it might be newer than the fresh 1.6.3 release...
>
> I think we can remove that old release candidate, or alternatively put a daily/weekly tarball of trunk on that page.
>

 Hi,

Why not release a new dev release (based on trunk) to each new release of 1.6.x/1.4.x ?

Regards,

> ---> Dirk Jagdmann ^ doj / cubic
> ----> http://cubic.org/~doj
> -----> http://llg.cubic.org
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe