(Paging LTE experts here....)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:02 AM, wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=39384
>
> User: wmeier
> Date: 2011/10/12 08:02 AM
>
> Log:
> Fix a benign bug: Use correct proto_tree_add_item() encoding arg.
At least as I read RFC 3095:
UOR-2-TS
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 1 1 0 | TS |
+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+
|T=1| M | SN |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| X | CRC |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
neither the old code nor the new code are correct - the "M" bit is in the octet after the TS field.
I don't see anything obvious in 3GPP TS 36.323 itself that says the format is different; does something in a later RFC specify something different?