[Stig Bjørlykke <stig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:51 PM,  <etxrab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Log:
>  Get rid of check_col, while at it set ENC.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
>  Changes    Path                      Action
>  +35 -37    packet-dmp.c              Modified

The remaining check_col in packet-dmp.c was left on purpose, because
we do not need this calculations if not having COL_INFO.

Should we really remove all occurrences of check_col?


-- 
Stig Bjørlykke