[Moussa.Alawieh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

thanks for your response....

However, what you said is very importanty
for me because I have put this function in many place of my code !!!!

Is there any other function that can
replace the "proto_tree_add_text()"
??

and do you think that it exist a way
to satisfy my question in the precedent mail ???

regards

ZODIAC DATA SYSTEMS SAS AEROSAFETY & TECHNOLOGY
Moussa ALAWIEH Stagiaire
moussa.alawieh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zodiacaerospace.com

De :      
 Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>
A :      
 wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date :      
 18/08/2011 15:57
Objet :    
   Re: [Wireshark-dev]
can't filter field in wireshark
Envoyé par :    
   wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

---

 <Moussa.Alawieh@...> writes:

> I put the result in Wireshark with the
> "proto_tree_add_text"
> function, but it's impossible
> to filter this field because it's a text !!!!!
> can someone help-me ???
> regards

Don't use proto_tree_add_text().  To quote doc/README.developer:

proto_tree_add_text() is used to add a label to the GUI tree.  It
will
contain no value, so it is not searchable in the display filter process.
This function was needed in the transition from the old-style proto_tree
to this new-style proto_tree so that Wireshark would still decode all
protocols w/o being able to filter on all protocols and fields.
Otherwise we would have had to cripple Wireshark's functionality while
we
converted all the old-style proto_tree calls to the new-style proto_tree
calls.  In other words, you should not use this in new code unless
you've got
a specific reason (see below).


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe