Thus wrote Stig Bj�rlykke (stig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> I don't know this code, or truncl() vs. floorl(), but maybe we just
> should use floorl() on all platforms?
> Then we at least get the same behavior.
Haven't looked into that before things stopped compiling today ;-)
gtk/time_shift_dlg.c is the only file where floorl()/truncl() are used.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html says
There are also built-in versions of the ISO C99 functions
... [list of functions, floorl() is in the list, truncl() isn't] ...
that are recognized in any mode since ISO C90 reserves these
names for the purpose to which ISO C99 puts them.
gcc doesn't get any parameters for a specific mode when I compile wireshark.
floorl() may be the better choice...