Alexander Koeppe skrev 2011-04-16 02:53:
Am 16.04.2011 02:37, schrieb Sake Blok:
On 16 apr 2011, at 02:10, Alexander Koeppe wrote:
But you maybe also know vendor's support people.
If they see a "truncated" they even don't believe anything.
If they see nothing, they believe everything.
I'll go the recompile way and increase the value of ITEM_LABEL_LENGTH
(thanks to Chris). it's not so costy for me.
If you need to recompile Wireshark to get the Vendor to believe the data in the trace file, I think it's about way over time to call their escalation manager :-)
Good luck!
Sake
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Well that's exactly what we're struggeling with.
We already reached the highest level of escalation. At least they tell
us so. The vendor is famous for never ever sending a specialist to any
customer.
Cheers Alex
First time I saw it - [Truncated] i found it a bit ambiguous perhaps it
should say
[Display Truncated] even if that's a bit longish.
Regards
Anders
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe