[Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Motonori Shindo skrev 2011-04-06 06:55:

Hi,

Current NetFlow V9/IPFIX dissector treats IN_BYTES (IE=1) and
IN_PERMANENT_BYTES (IE=85) exactly in the same way. The same applies
to IN_PKTS (IE=2) and IN_PERMANENT_PKTS (IE=86). However,
IN_BYTES/IN_PKTS and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES/IN_PERMANENT_PKTS have
different semantics so they should be distinguishable when they are
displayed or specified in a filter. Please find attached the patch
which does that.

Regards,

---
Motonori Shindo

You should attach your patch to a bug report at https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla
It does not apply though:
patching file epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c
patch: **** missing line number at line 5: @@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@
Regards
Anders

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe