[Martin Kaiser <lists@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Bill, Guy,

Thus wrote Guy Harris (guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx):

> > 2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual
> > data.
> >   I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just
> >   part
> >   of the captured data (similar to the code in your original patch).

> >   This is the approach used by packet-radiotap.c

> At this point, I prefer the second approach.  The Linux USB dissector
> now uses that, as of revision 32534; switching to that cleaned things
> up.

thanks for the feedback. I'll define the pseudo-header for DVB-CI, apply
for a DLT and modify my dissector accordingly.

Best regards,

   Martin
~                                                                                                                                                                                      
~                                                                                                                                                                                      
~                                                                                                                                                                                      
~                                                                                                                                                                                      
~