[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kaul wrote:
> 3. Corrected hextile encoding parsing. It's quite wrong the way it's 
> done today (see 2nd rectangle in packet 23 of the attached sample 
> capture). It completely ignored the fact that the hextile encoding is 
> actually encoding a series of 16 by 16 pixel tiles (hence hexTILE, I 
> reckon). This presents another problem which I don't know how to solve - 
> I'm getting too many (legitimate!) items in my tree - and wireshark 
> thinks I'm in an infinite loop. The fact it, each update may have 
> several rectangles, each may have subrectables, each may have tiles... 
> it's endless if the screen is big enough.

Hmmm, are the items really of that much interest to a user?  I mean, 
would someone really want to look at all 150,000 tiles (or whatever) 
one-by-one?  I would guess not, in which case it would probably make 
sense to just have an item that says "150,000 tiles."