jmayer@egg:~> wireshark
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Telephony-IAX2
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Telephony-SCTP
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Telephony-ANSI
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Telephony-GSM
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Telephony-GSM-A-Interface DTAP
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Telephony-MTP3
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Telephony-RTP
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Statistics-HTTP
(wireshark:27663): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_ui_manager_add_ui: assertion `name != NULL || type == GTK_UI_MANAGER_SEPARATOR' failed
03:08:04 Warn <Stat unsorted> Statistics-HTTP
03:08:04 Warn label HTTP/Requests Stats Tree
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Statistics-TCP Stream Graph
(wireshark:27663): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_ui_manager_add_ui: assertion `name != NULL || type == GTK_UI_MANAGER_SEPARATOR' failed
03:08:04 Warn <Stat unsorted> Statistics-TCP Stream Graph
03:08:04 Warn label TCP Stream Graph/Time-Sequence Graph (Stevens)
03:08:04 Warn <Branch> Tools-Lua
03:08:04 Warn <Tools> Tools-Lua
03:08:04 Warn label Lua/Evaluate
(wireshark:27663): Gtk-WARNING **: root node name 'Analyze/ConversationFilter/PN-IO AR' doesn't match 'ui'
(wireshark:27663): Gtk-WARNING **: root node name 'Analyze/ConversationFilter/PN-IO AR (with data)' doesn't match 'ui'
[repetitions removed]
While I attribute the warnings to the WIP status of this work messages
that contain stuff like "CRITICAL" or "assertion" followed by "failed"
make me a bit nervous.
Ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.