Hi Joan,
I am getting that error on both tshark and Wireshark with my build (32727) on Windows (32 bit). I tried doing a distclean; verify_tools; setup and build. It compiles without error, but refuses to capture. Looks like I chose a bad time to code a few changes ;-)
I haven't got around to investigating the issue in detail (yet)... I hope someone beats me to it.
Regards,
Abhik
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, j.snelders
<j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
SVN 32686
I get the same error (column-utils.c:879:???) running TShark on:
64-bit Windows 7, build 7600
64-bit Windows Server 2008 R2, build 7600
SVN 32692 and higher (the latest version I tried is SVN-32727):
Unable to capture with Wireshark and TShark, because "The capture session
could not be initiated ()" on:
64-bit Windows 7, build 7600
64-bit Windows Server 2008 R2, build 7600
Windows XP Service Pack 3, build 2600
$ tshark -D
1. \Device\NPF_{E859D76E-155B-4512-ACB6-B1B2A07914DB} (Intel(R) PRO/1000
MT Network Connection)
$ tshark -i 1
Capturing on Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network Connection
tshark: The capture session could not be initiated ().
Please check that "\Device\NPF_{E859D76E-155B-4512-ACB6-B1B2A07914DB}" is
the proper interface.
Help can be found at:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/WinPcap
http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup
0 packets captured
Any ideas?
Thanks
Joan
On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:37:13 -0400 Chris Maynard wrote:
Yes, I?m seeing the same thing on Windows with the same SVN version, 32686.
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Abhik Sarkar
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:00 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] tshark (Windows) not working
Hi All,
I can't get tshark to work anymore. I get this error:
E:\wireshark-src\wireshark-gtk2>tshark -i 2
Capturing on Intel(R) 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection
**
ERROR:column-utils.c:879:???: code should not be reached
E:\wireshark-src\wireshark-gtk2>
It seems to be related to the changes related to the timestamps which Stig
has been working on. Is anyone else facing issues?
I am on revision 32686.
Thanks,
Abhik.