[Kaul <mykaul@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Better file an enhancement bug, so it won't get lost.

Thanks,
Jaap

Sure. The idea was to get some feedback first, but OK: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4550
Y.
 

On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:32:24 +0200, Kaul <mykaul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Attached non-elegant patch shows, in addition to the already shown total
> number of bytes, the number of segments that were used to desegment a
> message.
> It may not be very efficient (and I'm open to suggestions on how to
> enhance it) but it works.
>
> diff against SVN r32082.
>
> TIA,
> Y.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe