You are right.
Your solution is more appropriate in this case.
> From: guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:42:36 -0800
> To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] getting the time
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 1:20 PM, philippe alarcon wrote:
>
> > Because I have used abs_time_secs_to_str() to convert the time value in a string.
>
> Why not make the *value* be the time as an nstime_t (set secs to the time value, set nsecs to 0), and use proto_tree_add_time_format_value() to display it without the fraction-of-a-second part?
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Avec Internet Explorer, surfez en toute discrétion sur internet Cliquez ici !
|