[Kovarththanan Rajaratnam <kovarththanan.rajaratnam@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hey,

Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:37:20PM +0200, Kovarththanan Rajaratnam wrote:
> OK, the (to me :-) convincing arguments were: More than double the amount
> of disk space needed during build (less important) and the dissectors were
> linked into the binaries statically instead of dynamically. Thinking a bit
> more about it, I think that the libs built by the autofoo system are some
> sort of "convenience" libs, they are not static libs.

Have you thought about how we should handle the autogenerated 
dissectors? I'm looking at this right now and I'm not quite sure how to 
do this in a clean fashion. Any ideas?

--
Best regards,
Kovarththanan Rajaratnam