[Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Gerald,

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:28:57AM +0000, gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=29005
> 
> User: gerald
> Date: 2009/07/07 05:28 PM
> 
> Log:
>  Fix several dissector assertions.
> 
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
>   Changes    Path             Action
>   +25 -20    packet-glbp.c    Modified

The idea of doing that lastoffset = offset ... stuff was, that I am reverse
engineering the protocol and I wanted to be able to safely resume dissection
if one element was not of the format that I expected it to have, e.g. have
some trailing information. Was there a specific reason to remove that
behaviour?

Thanks
      Joerg

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.