Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-users] bit operations aremissingfrom lua bindings

From: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:51:54 -0700
2009/6/10 Stig Bjørlykke <stig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sam Roberts<vieuxtech@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thank you for including the range and bitfield.
>> Will this be in the next release?
>
> 1.2 is currently in feature freeze, so the range and bitfield have to wait.

No problem, I won't rewrite my dissector to use those features until
they are released.

> I'm still unsure about the int64 issues...

What issues?

Unsure about the value of getting rid of the need to g_malloc() uint64s?

Or are you still seeing __gc not called, or some other misbehaviour?

Cheers,
Sam