[yvanmmailbox-web@xxxxxxxx]

I tried 1.0.7 and it works.

Thanks for your help

Yvan

---

De : "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>
À : Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé le : Mardi, 14 Avril 2009, 18h58mn 41s
Objet : Re: [Wireshark-dev] Re : RVALS in display filters

C:\wireshark\svn\epan\dissectors>grep -l RVALS packet-*.c

packet-ansi_map.c

packet-homeplug.c

packet-mp4ves.c

packet-ospf.c

packet-rsvp.c

packet-smpp.c

 

If you still have problems, you might try 1.0.7 or the latest SVN.

- Chris

 

 

From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of yvanmmailbox-web@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 12:24 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Re : RVALS in display filters

 

Yes, it is. I also use this structure to display information in the COL_INFO and in the proto_tree_add_protocol_format() using the rval_to_str(), and it works.

I tried to just add the item in the tree but it is impossible if I don't have also the hf declared in the hf_register_info, so maybe it is in the proto_tree_add_uint() call.

I don't use SVN, so my old (beginning of March, 1.0.6 -27387) version might have a bug, but I haven't seen anything about this in the previous messages. Was the update of proto.c a good idea?

As I can't send the complete code (internal use), is there a dissector that uses the range_string structure as I need?

Thanks a lot for your help, Chris

Yvan

 

---

De : "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx>
À : Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé le : Mardi, 14 Avril 2009, 17h47mn 14s
Objet : Re: [Wireshark-dev] RVALS in display filters

Everything looks OK to me.  How is afdx_type declared?  Does it match the README.developer’s example?

 

      static const range_string rvalstringname[] = {

            { INTVAL_MIN1, INTVALMAX1, "Descriptive String 1" },

            { INTVAL_MIN2, INTVALMAX2, "Descriptive String 2" },

            { 0,           0,          NULL                   }

      };

 

- Chris

 

From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of yvanmmailbox-web@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 9:32 AM
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] RVALS in display filters

 

Hi all,

I am working on a dissector plugin.
I have a problem with the use of RVALS in display filter. As indicated in README.developer, I wrote my code like that:

...
guint8 type = 0;
....
type = tvb_get_guint8(tvb, 29);
...
proto_tree_add_uint(afdx_tree, hf_type, tvb, 29, 1, type);
...
{ &hf_type,
            { "Data type  ", "afdx.type", FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC|BASE_RANGE_STRING, RVALS(afdx_type), 0x0,
                "Type of data carried", HFILL }},


I changed my file proto.c as indicated in this url, because it didn't integrate the BASE_RANGE_STRING:
http://www.nabble.com/rev-26257:--trunk-epan---trunk-epan-:-proto.c-td19639466.html

But it does not solve the problem. I still can't run WireShark with this code in my plugin, and the problem seems to come from RVALS or interpretation of BASE_RANGE_STRING.

Does anyone can help me?

Thanks a lot!

Yvan

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential

and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this

email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and 

notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,

forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and 
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.