Thanks Jaap,
Actually somehow I thought the right way to send patch was to send the
patch file to the mailing list... oh well...
Will open the bug.
Fabrizio
On Mar 3, 2009, at 8:35 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi Fabrizio,
The best thing to do is to open an Enhancement bug in
bugs.wireshark.org and
attach your patch there. That way it won't get lost in the
mailinglist and can
discussions be tracked with the relevant code.
Thanx,
Jaap
Fabrizio Bertocci wrote:
Jaap,
Thanks for your reply.
I would like to submit a patch to the existing RTPS & RTPS2 packet
dissectors available on the development trunk.
See attached patch file.
This patch apply to the latest version that I took just now from the
trunk of the SVN repository.
It contains various fixes and support to the latest features of the
RTPS
protocol (version 2.1).
Let me know if there are any problems integrating it.
Regards,
Fabrizio Bertocci
On 2/27/09 9:59 PM, "Jaap Keuter" <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Fabrizio,
The new dissectors are already in the right place. You'll have to
understand
that once Wireshark 1.0 went out the door it is considered stable.
That means no
new or changed features, just bug fixes go in. All new
development,
new features
etc go into the development tree (where rtps[2].c also live),
hence will
automatically be included in the upcoming stable release (1.2) due
in June this
year.
Have a look at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/ReleaseNumbers
and
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Roadmap to see what's
going on.
Thanx,
Jaap
Fabrizio Bertocci wrote:
All,
Does anybody know why the RTPS and RTPS2 packet dissectors
(epan/dissectors/packet-rtps.c, epan/dissectors/packet-rtps2.c and
their
relative header files) are not part of the official wireshark
distributions?
I’ve submitted the new packet dissectors long time ago. It got
approved
and checked in the main repository, but they are not part of any
source
distributions.
The RTPS packet dissector that shows up in the official
distribution is
an older version and considered now obsolete.
What is the right procedure to push the new dissectors in the
release
process?
Regards,
Fabrizio Bertocci
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe