mytree = subtree:add(tvb:range(0x1), "STUFF")
should work
or better if you defina a protoField lets'say
local pf_mine = ProtoField.uint8("my_field")
...
mytree = subtree:add(pf_mine, "STUFF")
should not only highlight the bytes but should create a filterable
field "my_proto.my_filed" for the byte(s) in the tvbRange.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Rowswell, Brent
<brent.rowswell@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've been trying to use this to get the subtrees to highlight, and so
> far I can only get the first subtree to highlight correctly. Here's the
> syntax of what I'm trying.
>
> local subtree = (tree:add(my_proto, tvb:range(), "my header")) -- works
> local mytree = (subtree:add("TEST ", tvb:range(0x1), "STUFF")) --
> doesn't highlight
>
> I know that wireshark can highlight the subtrees just by looking at the
> ethernet filters in the hex pane, but for some reason this isn't
> highlighting there. What should I do to get this to highlight. The way
> I figure this should work is the first one highlights the entire tvb,
> which it does, and the second should highlight all but the first byte,
> which it doesn't.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luis EG
> Ontanon
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:47 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LUA development highlighting bytefield
> display with LUA
>
> Lua uses the very same API that dissectors use. For protocol tree items
> created with Lua (when they are given a tvbRange) the bytes in the hex
> dump pane get highlighted as with any other dissector.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Rowswell, Brent
> <brent.rowswell@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hey there,
>>
>> I was wondering if there was a way to make my LUA dissector highlight
>> specific bytes in the bytefield display so that they stand out easily,
>
>> such as the various portions of my header and attach these to the
>> subtrees that explain what they are. I know something that does this
>> is already built into wireshark and that it works very well for
>> predefined message types, for instance it dissects TCP headers is a
>> very readable way so that you can actually see which bytes correspond
>> to the source and destination addresses. I would like to do something
>
>> similar on my own message type, so that the specific portions of my
>> message are easily readable after dissection. Is there any way to do
> this inside my LUA script?
>>
>> Brent Rowswell
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireshark-dev mailing list
>> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy
> yourself.
> -- Marshall McLuhan
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan