Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've stumbled upon c-ares (http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/) as a
> possible replacement for ADNS, which we currently have as async DNS resolver
> library.
> Pro's: Still being developed, IPv6 support, multi-platform, MIT license.
> Con's: May suffer from same memory allocation issues on Win32 as does ADNS.
>
> Does anyone have further insights into the use of this library?
It looks interesting. The fact that it's documented and actively developed is
encouraging.