Guy Harris wrote:
> which would probably be OK for the packet list if we were to switch to
> using a GtkTreeView, which would let us change the columns without
> destroying the packet list and reconstructing it, and would also let us
> avoid allocating strings for the content of all rows and columns by
> having a tree model that dissects packets on the fly (that requires
> support for fast random access to packets even in compressed files, but
> that's probably doable).
We could also group related packets in a collapsible tree item, e.g. a TCP
conversation, or 802.11n aggregated data...