Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] nested dissector

From: "Abhik Sarkar" <sarkar.abhik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:47:03 +0400
If I understand you correctly, Filippo, I think you want to know how
you can find out from within your plug-in if the "mikey" dissector was
called (and did its work). I think one of the ways would be to use
pinfo->layer_names (which corresponds to frame.protocols). If you can
find the string "mikey" in this field after the protocol has been
called and has done its work, I think it will work.

Perhaps there is a cleaner way of finding out but I hope this helps.

Best regards,
Abhik.

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  Ehm, I don't follow. Either you call the dissector or you don't. You'll see
>  the mikey dissectors output in the packet detail pane.
>
>  Thanx,
>  Jaap
>
>  Filippo Margiotta wrote:
>  > Hi Jaap,
>  > your information were very useful form me. Thank you.
>  >
>  > I would ask you another question.
>  > I used as your suggestion the function
>  > call_dissector(mikey_handle, sub_tvb, ppinfo, tree)
>  > from the plugin.
>  >
>  > How can I understand if the the dissect_mikey is called by the plugin or
>  > not.
>  > Depending on that I should do different thinks.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > FIlippo
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > 2008/3/16, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx
>  > <mailto:jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>>:
>  >
>  >     Hi,
>  >
>  >     You could use find_dissector("mikey") to get a handle on it and call
>  >     it with a
>  >     tvb subset containing the payload for mikey.
>  >     Many examples like this in the Wireshark dissectors source tree.
>  >
>  >     Thanx,
>  >     Jaap
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >     Filippo Margiotta wrote:
>  >      > Hi All,
>  >      > the company I am working has a propietary plugin to dissect a
>  >     specific
>  >      > protocol (let's call XXX). I should add a dissector for the
>  >     data_payload
>  >      > field in the XXX to be decoded by the MIKEY dissector.
>  >      >
>  >      > Somebody could help me on this please?
>  >      >
>  >      > Thanks,
>  >      > Filippo
>  >      >
>  >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Wireshark-dev mailing list
>  Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>