Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Problems with epan\oids.c

From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:41:12 +0100
Hi,

Could you point us to these newer versions?

Thanx,
Jaap

Peter Johansson wrote:
2008/3/15, Andrew Hood <ajhood@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:ajhood@xxxxxxxxx>>:

    Stig Bj�rlykke wrote:
     > On 13. mars. 2008, at 15.51, Peter Johansson wrote:
     >
     >> Could this then be of the same type of issue that is with
    adns,  hence
     >> it is required to recompile libsmi too if using
    another  compiler for
     >> Wireshark on Windows than MSVC 6. Developer Studio  2005EE for
    instance?
     >
     >
     >
     > Does it work correctly on win32 with user specified MIBs without
     > running in the debugger?
     > Or do we have to make some changes before releasing 1.0?  Like revert
     > r24569 and live with the memory leakage?
     >
     > I'm getting crashes on win32 with 0.99.8 having a custom MIB with
     > duplicated DESCRIPTION field (attached), so we probably have some
    more
     > issues using libsmi...

    Does your custom MIB work if you define it as attached?
    If it does it might be a libsmi bug.

    --
    There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
                   -- Dr. Who

    MY-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

    IMPORTS
           MODULE-IDENTITY, enterprises
           FROM SNMPv2-SMI
           ;

    myValues MODULE-IDENTITY
           LAST-UPDATED "200802270000Z"
           ORGANIZATION "Private"
           CONTACT-INFO "Stig"
           DESCRIPTION  "My Description"
           REVISION     "200802270000Z"
           DESCRIPTION  "Version 1.0"
           ::= { thalesNorwayAS 4 }

    thalesNorwayAS OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { enterprises 3752 }

    END


    _______________________________________________
    Wireshark-dev mailing list
    Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev


There are more (multiple) recent versions of libsmi than 0.4.5, why was 0.4.5 choosen (perhaps because it was the one that was available at the time of introduction). Should a newer version of the library be considered? This might help with some of the crashes, it will not however address the double free calls (on Windows). / Peter