[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Guy Harris wrote:

> Given that the mantissa of a double is, in most if not all platforms, 
> less than 64 bits long, the right type for the "nanoseconds" part of the 
> time stamp is probably an FT_UINT64, not an FT_DOUBLE, so your change 
> should be combined with changes to fix all the hf_ values passed in to 
> dissect_ptp_v2_timeInterval() for the nanosecond part of the time 
> interval to be FT_UINT64.

Anders Broman'd already checked your patch in, so I checked in a change 
to fix the types of the fields in question.