Hi,
it is fixed with revision 23916.
Tomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Sergio Mayoral
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:32 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] ASN.1 enumeration extension
> coding question
>
> Hi,
>
> I am also having this problem. I found a book called
> "ASN.1 Communication between Heterogeneous Systems"
> written by Olivier Dubuisson, who looks to be an
> expert on ASN.1, where it is explicitly said:
>
> - If the ENUMERATED type is extensible (or if the
> module includes the EXTENSIBILITY IMPLIED clause in
> its header), a preamble of one bit is appended to the
> bit-field (without being octet-aligned).
>
> "Normally small non-negative whole number encoding"
>
> - if 0 <= n <= 63, a 0-bit is appended to the
> bit-field (without being octet-aligned), followed by
> the binary encoding of n on 6 bits.
>
> Regards
>
> --- "Nichols, Roger" <Roger.Nichols@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is this the proper forum to ask a question about
> > 'why' something is
> > coded the way it is?
> >
> > We are developing a V.34 enabled T.38 end point, and
> > are confused by the
> > Wireshark decoding. It seems the Wireshark decoder
> > is aligning fields
> > which are extension values. For example, the 2002
> > T.38 ASN.1 notation
> > for V.34 Data Field values. We are not aligning
> > these enumeration
> > values, but Wireshark does. See line 1211 of
> > packet-per.c, a comment
> > which says to align without giving a reference, and
> > 1214 which does the
> > alignment. Reading ITU X.691 section 13, I would
> > not expect this
> > beahvior. As Wireshark community is the only place
> > I know of an
> > existing product which handles the V.34 additions to
> > T.38, it seems a
> > good place to ask. Why are these values aligned?
> > We could not find an
> > ITU reference giving us reason to do so.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Roger Nichols
> > Firmware Engineer
> >
> > Cantata Technology, Inc. (a Dialogic company)
> > 15 Crawford Street
> > Needham, MA 02494
> > USA
> >
> > Tel: 781 292 9399
> > Fax: 781 453 3521
> > Email: roger.nichols@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Web: www.dialogic.com
> >
> > This e-mail is intended only for the named
> > recipient(s) and may contain
> > information that is privileged, confidential and/or
> > exempt from
> > disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of
> > privilege, confidence or
> > otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via
> > the internet. Any
> > unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is
> > strictly prohibited. If
> > you have received this e-mail in error, or are not
> > named as a recipient,
> > please immediately notify the sender and destroy all
> > copies of this
> > e-mail.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>