Hi,
You are right. It is much better. I will use it instead of current solution. Thank you very much!
Valery.
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luis EG Ontanon
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:29 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dynamically allocated field array
why don't you use a GArray?
http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/2.14/glib-Arrays.html
you can take a look on how radius and diameter do that, it is far better.
Luis
On Nov 28, 2007 10:57 PM, Valery Sigalov <Valery.Sigalov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Great, thank you! I received your changes. Sorry for inconvenience. I will
> check the proto_register_field_array issue.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Valery.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kukosa, Tomas
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 11:41 PM
>
>
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dynamically allocated field array
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It is not a problem when you call realloc only few times.
>
>
> It only slowed down startup when realloc was called for each fiels but I
> have it already fixed it.
>
>
>
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Od: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx za uživatele Valery Sigalov
> Odesláno: st 28.11.2007 22:21
> Komu: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
> Předmět: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dynamically allocated field array
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you, I will do it. I will also think about better solution. For
> example, I can write the number of fields in tpncp.dat file and perform the
> memory allocation only once instead of using realloc.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Valery.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kukosa, Tomas
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 11:03 PM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dynamically allocated field array
>
>
>
>
>
> I have already made some changes in memory allocation. Please update your
> source.
>
>
> If it is possible to call proto_register_field_array() only once, please try
> it.
>
>
>
>
>
> It is not critical for 0.99.7.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Od: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx za uživatele Valery Sigalov
> Odesláno: st 28.11.2007 21:47
> Komu: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
> Předmět: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dynamically allocated field array
>
>
> Hi,
> I agree it looks somewhat awkward. The TPNCP is constantly changing, so the
> fields are allocated dynamically by reading the tpncp.dat file at
> application startup. I replaced all the memory management functions with
> glib's analogs before submitting the patch, but I missed these two somehow,
> sorry. This code was written a long time ago and, as far as I remember, I
> had some problems passing dynamically allocated array to
> proto_register_field_array function, so I registered the fields one-by-one.
> Do you see the better solution? I will be glad to implement it. Meanwhile I
> will replace realloc and memcpy with glib's analogs. Is it critical for
> 0.99.7 release?
>
> Thank you,
> Valery.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 8:09 PM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dynamically allocated field array
>
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, and I though we're using glib functions for memory management. All
> this realloc and memcpy look ugly.
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
> Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
> > The packet-tpncp.c has dynamically allocated fields array and register
> > them one by one:
> >
> > /*
> > * The function proto_register_field_array can not work with dynamic
> > arrays,
> > * so passing dynamic array elements one-by-one in the loop.
> > */
> > for(index = 0; index < hf_size; index++) {
> > proto_register_field_array(proto_tpncp, &hf[index], 1);
> > }
> >
> > Is it really necessary?
> > Why proto_register_field_array(proto_tpncp, hf, hf_size); can not be
> used?
> > I have probably missed something.
> >
> > Tomas
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev