On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:26:23PM +1100, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> I have commited an initial and very limited X.224 dissector that
> registers TPKT on port 3389 and makes TPKT spawn off this port into
> X.224 instead.
>
> The X.224 dissector is very incomplete and only really dissects
> CR/CC/DT and only for class 0. But it is good enough for now as a
> start to decode up to and including the X.224 layer for remote
> desktop.
Do we actually need an X.224 dissector in Wireshark? My understanding
is that the ITU's X.224 recommendation is nearly identical to ISO's 8073
COTP, which Wireshark already supports.
Steve